Unconstitutionality of prohibition of abortion

  1. In accordance with Article 6, clause 2 (the "Supremacy Clause") to the US Constitution, pursuant to:
    1. The 1st amendment to the US Constitution; freedom of expression and freedom of religion; the following religions allow abortions; i.e., Reform Judaism, Conservative Judaism, Unitarian Universalism, The United Church of Christ, and Atheism. Obviously a woman that wants an abortion has a religion that allows abortions afforded by the 1st amendment to the US Constitution;
    2. The 13th amendment to the US Constitution, prohibition of involuntary servitude; involuntary servitude is prohibited unless punishment for a crime, after a person is afforded due process and has been convicted of a crime by a jury of their peers pursuant to the 5th, 13th, and 14th amendments to the US Constitution; i.e., the State cannot [lawfully] make a person carry around a lead ball like prisoners used to have chained to their leg. Why wouldn't the State saying what a person can and can't do with their body be the same? Especially when the requirement requires the person to labor without compensation and without being punishment for a crime.
  2. Pursuant to well established policy/rule of law that the US does NOT recognize an unborn child as having rights per how the US handles "birth tourism;" e.g., "‘Maternity tourism’ raids target California operations catering to Chinese". The US does not treat unborn children as citizens for immigrants or foreigners visiting the US, why would unborn children to US citizens be treated differently? Seemingly in violation of the 14th amendment to the US Constitution.

What's more, the states themselves that prohibit abortions have a fiduciary duty responsibility to pay for all direct and indirect costs arising for the child; i.e., housing, sustenance, education, medical, etc at minimum until the child is 18 years of age. Why? The State is typically liable for the aforementioned and damage anything sustains whilst in the State's custody; e.g., Russian oligarch's yacht is costing U.S. taxpayers close to $1 million a month.